My skin, download My skin free, free My skin skin download, free download of My skin skin for Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast, Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast free skin My skin download, download for free My skin Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast, free download full skin My skin, direct download link My skin, download My skin skins
full download My skin Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast, Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast My skin, free Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast skins My skin, My skin direct download free, My skin download for free, My skin Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast download link, free download Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast My skin, My skin skin, Star Wars Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast skinning
Description Well. This is certainly an interesting reskin. Someone's gone and taken an Obi-Wan model and attempted to make him look like a Chiss, and get this, a Chiss Jedi.
First off, here's a tip. If you want a Chiss Jedi, use the Chiss model, or. Or at least do a good job redoing the skin. Please don't just put what looks like a blue overlay. Last time I checked, Chiss were a lot more blue than what is portrayed here. Hm, maybe he's a mutant? :p
Anyways, the robes have been changed. They're a lighter, more sandy color. I'm not sure if this is just me, or a model, or a skinning error, but judging by some areas, I'd say it's a skin error. What's the skin error? Just look at the screenshot. It looks like there's z-fighting on the skin! Why do I think that it's a skin error? Because there are white areas that don't z-fight. Heh. This does have custom taunts, and they're home recorded. I like the "I like pie" one, but the voice should be deeper.
There was another thing that could be worked on - the eyes. I don't think that [i]just[/i] the pupils of the Chiss eyes glowed. But only the pupils glow in this skin. As I know, the entire chiss eyeball glows, not just the pupil.
New Sounds: Yes
Team Support: No
Bot Support: No
~Zach
Also, next time don't have your skin named "My skin", as it's a very ambiguous phrase, and we like a little bit of customisation.